The people leveling the criticism at BAP are in two camps: 1) mentally deficient America First-ers who worship the glowing Nick Fuentes and think that anyone who doesn't obsess over the "JQ" or tirelessly advocate for a Catholic American Monarchy (perish the thought) is a JEWISH SUBVERTITRON; and 2) people envious of BAP's popularity (generally writers who lack humor).
As a normie liberal centrist, I thoroughly enjoy listening to BAP and most of his critics are just envious cretins. But I wonder about his political "vision," such as it is. He presents us with a model of life that is seductive: a nomad wandering the cities of the world, giving us a glimpse of his thoughts, teaching us about what he has learned. He has shown us how we can save our own souls, and not participate in the great lies of our age. But what does this imply politically? Will normie politics be enough? There are signs that this IS in fact BAP's political view--he praises effective normies like Rufo, calls out obvious frauds like Vermeule... but I would very much like to ask him questions about "what is to be done?"
Whatever BAP says, and he says everything, a recent escapee from Foggy Bottom has penned a sort of latter day Juvenal ...
“ Leo is the protagonist watching young men go into State one morning:
‘Leo sat and watched a seeming parade of slender young men in tight-fitted suits pass him by toward the basement entrance. They looked to him like domesticated ferrets, emaciated and neutered, bi-pedaling upright at the command of an unseen master, some with torsos bent in false humility, others of awkward gait—none with any hope of propagating their kind. Their twitchy eyes peered out of withered if neatly groomed heads with the ill-concealed fear of contingent animals, whose survival required them to prey on the few species beneath them on the mammalian food chain. These weak-chinned albinos of the weasel family would, Leo knew, be hunted in nature unto a quick, merciless, and just extinction. Only the Building kept them safe. He watched each descend the concrete steps and pass through security turnstiles into obscurity—there to concelebrate with ten thousand other Anglo-Saxon eunuchs the slow immolation of the American imperium. It was that death of which they were, for all their self-loathing, the unwitting heralds.’
The people leveling the criticism at BAP are in two camps: 1) mentally deficient America First-ers who worship the glowing Nick Fuentes and think that anyone who doesn't obsess over the "JQ" or tirelessly advocate for a Catholic American Monarchy (perish the thought) is a JEWISH SUBVERTITRON; and 2) people envious of BAP's popularity (generally writers who lack humor).
BAP is Ismaili....few know this.
I LOL'ed at the Unz parody
As a normie liberal centrist, I thoroughly enjoy listening to BAP and most of his critics are just envious cretins. But I wonder about his political "vision," such as it is. He presents us with a model of life that is seductive: a nomad wandering the cities of the world, giving us a glimpse of his thoughts, teaching us about what he has learned. He has shown us how we can save our own souls, and not participate in the great lies of our age. But what does this imply politically? Will normie politics be enough? There are signs that this IS in fact BAP's political view--he praises effective normies like Rufo, calls out obvious frauds like Vermeule... but I would very much like to ask him questions about "what is to be done?"
W/rgd to our elites...
Whatever BAP says, and he says everything, a recent escapee from Foggy Bottom has penned a sort of latter day Juvenal ...
“ Leo is the protagonist watching young men go into State one morning:
‘Leo sat and watched a seeming parade of slender young men in tight-fitted suits pass him by toward the basement entrance. They looked to him like domesticated ferrets, emaciated and neutered, bi-pedaling upright at the command of an unseen master, some with torsos bent in false humility, others of awkward gait—none with any hope of propagating their kind. Their twitchy eyes peered out of withered if neatly groomed heads with the ill-concealed fear of contingent animals, whose survival required them to prey on the few species beneath them on the mammalian food chain. These weak-chinned albinos of the weasel family would, Leo knew, be hunted in nature unto a quick, merciless, and just extinction. Only the Building kept them safe. He watched each descend the concrete steps and pass through security turnstiles into obscurity—there to concelebrate with ten thousand other Anglo-Saxon eunuchs the slow immolation of the American imperium. It was that death of which they were, for all their self-loathing, the unwitting heralds.’
“Racism in Latin America, Alamariu points out, is based upon hue, with lighter people having higher status.”
That was the whole world until the 19th Amendment.
Latin America does this recursively since early 19th century.
This alamariu fellow seems pretty chill
Yes, but is he GAY